Effect of emulsifiers on the extrusion process and sensory analysis of dry dog food
pdf

Keywords

Chewability
Factory
Kibbles
Processing
Water activity.

How to Cite

Rocha Junior, C. M. da, Bertechini, A. G., Brighenti, C. R. G., Teixeira, A. de O., Rocha, G. C., Vidigal, M. C. T. R., … Silveira, M. M. B. M. (2023). Effect of emulsifiers on the extrusion process and sensory analysis of dry dog food. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 44(2), 613–624. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2023v44n2p613

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the effects of emulsifying agents on processing and texture characteristics of kibbles in the pet food industry. For each treatment, four runs were performed (four replications/treatment) and four samples were collected over time. Two commercial emulsifiers, added on top of the formulation, were used in an economical extruded dry food for adult dogs, forming three treatments, namely, CON: control; EMUA: CON + 0.06% emulsifier A; and EMUB: CON + 0.06% emulsifier B. The foods were extruded in a single-screw extruder with a throughput of 6,000 kg/h, and the same set of equipment, mixing, drying, and coating conditions were adopted for all treatments. Emulsifier A contains partially saturated mono- and diglycerides, sodium stearoyl lactylate, and diacetyl tartaric acid esters of monoglycerides in its composition; whereas emulsifier B includes mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids, diacetyl tartaric acid esters of monoglycerides, and stearoyl sodium lactate. Canonical correlation analysis was performed for process correlation and kibble texture characteristics data. The multivariate lambda Wilks test was used to assess the significance of the canonical roots together. Canonical function 1 was found to be significant. There was control in the process, due to the clustering of treatments. The use of emulsifiers influenced the hardness of the kibbles, with lower resistance found in EMUA (54.731 ± 1.124) than in EMUB (121.898 ± 5.158). The EMUB treatment showed lower amperage, power, and energy consumption values than the other treatments (P<0.05). Compared with the control treatment, the EMUA and EMUB treatments showed 1.43% and 3.15% lower amperage values, respectively. In conclusion, EMUB contributes more significantly to texture characteristics and to the extrusion process.

https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2023v44n2p613
pdf

References

Araújo, J. M. A. (2015). Química de alimentos: teoria e prática (6nd ed.). Editora UFV.

Bastida-Rodríguez, J., Lefebvre, F., Subrt, J., & Ten Elshof, J. E. (2013). The food additive polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E-476): structure, applications, and production methods. ISRN Chemical Engineering, 2013(2013), 1-21. doi: 10.1155/2013/124767

Butts, C. T. (2009). Yet another canonical correlation analysis package. https://rdrr.io/cran/yacca/man/yacca-package.html

Carciofi, A. C., Palagiano, C., Sá, F. C., Martins, M. S., Gonçalves, K. N. V., Bazolli, R. S., Souza, D. F., & Vasconcellos, R. S. (2012). Amylase utilization for the extrusion of dog diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 177(3-4), 211-217. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.08.017

Chen, L. (2015). Emulsifiers as food texture modifiers. In J. Chen, & A. Rosenthal (Eds.), Modifying food texture: novel ingredients and processing techniques (Vol. 1, pp. 27-49). Woodhead Publishing/Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-1-78242-333-1.00002-4

Chiang, B.-Y., & Johnson, J. A. (1977). Measurement of total and gelatinized starch by glucoamylase and o-toluidine reagent. Cereal Chemistry, 54(3), 429-435. https://www.cerealsgrains.org/publications/cc/backissues/1977/Documents/cc1977a51.html

Dainton, A. N., Dogan, H., & Aldrich, C. G. (2021). The effects of select hydrocolloids on the processing of pâté-style canned pet food. Foods, 10(10), 2506. doi: 10.3390/foods10102506

Friberg, S. E., Larsson, K., & Sjoblom, J. (2004). Food emulsions fourth edition, revised and expanded. http://www.dekker.com

Gawor, J. P., Reiter, A. M., Jodkowska, K., Kurski, G., Wojtacki, M. P., & Kurek, A. (2006). Influence of diet on oral health in cats and dogs. Journal of Nutrition, 136(7 Suppl.), 2021S-2023S. doi: 10.1093/jn/136.7.021S

González, I., & Déjean, S. (2009). Canonical correlation analysis. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/CCA/CCA.pdf

Koppel, K., Monti, M., Gibson, M., Alavi, S., Di Donfrancesco, B., & Carciofi, A. C. (2015). The effects of fiber inclusion on pet food sensory characteristics and palatability. Animals, 5(1), 110-125. doi: 10.3390/ani5010110

Logan, E. I. (2006). Dietary influences on periodontal health in dogs and cats. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 36(6), 1385-1401. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2006.09.002

McClements, D. J. (2015). Food emulsions. CRC Press.

Menzel, U. (2009). Significance tests for canonical correlation analysis (CCA). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/CCP/index.html

R Core Team (2018). A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org

Rokey, G. J., Plattner B., & Souza, E.M. (2010). Feed extrusion process description. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 39(Suppl. Special), 510-518. doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982010001300055

Zanatta, C. P., Félix, A. P., Oliveira, S. G., & Maiorka, A. (2016). Fatores que regulam o consumo e a preferência alimentar em cães. Scientia Agraria Paranaensis, 15(2), 109-114. doi: 10.18188/1983-1471/sap.v15n2p109-114

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Semina: Ciências Agrárias

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.