Análise comparativa da processualística dos atos internacionais no MERCOSUL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5433/2178-8189.2004v7n0p105Keywords:
Integration law, Mercosur, Constitutional law.Abstract
The article has the purpose to compare Constitutional rules that instruct Processualistic of International Acts in a sense of defining what are the main hindrances that delay International Treaty approval and its effective aplications, both externally and internally. Didactic-hypothetic was the Methodology employed. The decisions achieved refer to an unlimited sovereignty that are currently endowed, the Constitutions of the Part-States, as well as the process to reach harmony with the same ones and the question of MERCOSUR-Court creation, with autonomy in decisions and same hierarchy as Part-States' Constitutions.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2004-12-15
How to Cite
Noronha, T., & Kinoshita, F. (2004). Análise comparativa da processualística dos atos internacionais no MERCOSUL. Scientia Iuris, 7, 105–125. https://doi.org/10.5433/2178-8189.2004v7n0p105
Issue
Section
Artigos
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal reserves the right to modify, in the original text of the submitted article, normative, spelling and grammatical mistakes in order to maintain the cultured standard of language and the credibility of the journal. The journal will respect the authors' writing style. Changes, corrections or suggestions of conceptual order will be sent to the authors, when necessary. In such cases, the articles will be re-examined. The final exams will not be sent to the authors. The published works become the property of the journal, in other words, its total or partial reprinting is subject to the express authorization of the journal. In all subsequent citations, the original source of publication shall be cited and in the case of Photographic Speeches, shall be approved by the original author. The opinions expressed by the authors of the journal's articles are of their sole responsibility.













